Advertiser
Publisher
Home
Advertisers
Advertiser Overview
Capabilities
Video Ad Gallery
Video Ad Network
Real-Time Bidding
Working with Us
Apply Today
Publishers
Publisher Overview
Capabilities
Real-Time Bidding
Private Exchange
Working with Us
Apply Today
Capabilities
Capabilities Overview
Targeting & Reach
Auto-Optimization
Brand Protection
Real-Time Bidding
Publisher Network
Our Partners
News
Press Releases
In the News
Press Kit
Events
About
Company Background
Team
Investors
Affiliations & Awards
Careers
Partners
Blog
Contact
Categories:
Doug Render
,
Newsletter - SpotXchange Insight
,
The Latest
SpotXchange Blog Home
Tweet
Ad Servers and Online Video Ads
ClickZ ran an interesting
article
on the "state of online video ads"from the vantage point of
serving
firms like Atlas and DoubleClick. While SpotXchange is much more than an
serving
firm-we are, in fact, a full service
video network
that provides a marketplace for dynamically matching
advertisers
with available
publisher
inventory, in addition to providing the video
serving
, tracking and reporting functions associated with pure
serving
firms-I took an interest in this story.
Author Hollis Thomases identifies various barriers to broader video advertising adoption, particularly third-party
serving
. The lack of standardization in reporting and measurement guidelines has certainly been a point of contention in the space, but I would argue that it has not been a fundamental barrier. Until the
Interactive Advertising Bureau
makes much more serious progress on standardization,
agencies
,
publishers
and service providers alike recognize that we must make due with the respective measurement and reporting that is available. Reach and CTR, familiar metrics offline and on, respectively, have shown to be those generating the most interest from
advertisers
. A number of more advanced metrics are available from some service providers, including SpotXchange, but I'm not convinced that
advertisers
have figured out how to best act on those metrics, so they remain a novelty to most.
Different ad formats, according to Thomases, represent another challenge to
advertisers
. I agree with Atlas' Geoff Coco, quoted as calling this a non-issue. (SpotXchange has worked quite closely with Coco as members of the
IAB
's third-party
serving
committee). Transcoding an
advertiser
's original video commercial into the few formats that
publishers
need (more than 94 percent of the traffic across our network in December 2007 was FLV) is a commodity service that should intimidate absolutely no one. If Thomases and her colleagues do not see this happening readily, the problem isn't that they are not asking "loud enough", it's that they are not asking the right question, or perhaps not the right person.
The more pressing challenge, as Coco points out, is "how the player interacts with the ad system and its content feeds...[and the]...interoperability...[of] the ad request and delivery formats."I think this point may be lost on the author because she is mistakenly under the impression that, "with initial online
video ad
space in demand and inventory availability low,
publishers
could easily sell out their ad space without having to make any system modifications."This may be true for ABC's Desperate Housewives, or other "super premium"content providers, but it's not the reality for the other 99 percent of
publishers
out there. Not only do they not have the "
brand
name"that brings
advertisers
to them, they lack the sales and
serving
infrastructure that would allow them to fully accommodate these
advertisers
if they did come knocking. Show me 99 different
publishers
and I will show you 99 different video player components and configurations that may, or may not, be compatible with
advertisers
' preference for
serving
and tracking their campaigns.
Most
publishers
rely on multiple ad sources to fill their available inventory-generally a direct sales effort, as well as membership in one or more networks like SpotXchange. It's the diversity of the various
publishers
and their player technologies, compounded with the diversity of ad suppliers, that make interoperability and integration the industry's real bugaboo.
Serving
video ads is hard.
Serving
video ads from multiple sources (and creating the business logic to direct which source to hit at which time and under which circumstances) is even more challenging.
Serving
multiple
ad units
, including InStream (pre-, mid-,
post-roll
) and interactive
overlay
units (such as
SpotXchange's
own InnerStream unit), from multiple sources is more daunting yet.
These complexities are why SpotXchange and other ad providers invest so much time and energy developing competency at ad syndication and integration-it's one of the most significant assets we bring to the advertiser/publisher equation. If advertisers and publishers allow us to do our jobs correctly, neither of them should have to invest heavily in building their own capabilities in these processes.
By Doug Render On January 18, 2008
SpotXchange
Targeted Video Advertising
Video Publishing Platform
Video Advertising Blog
Privacy Policy
Video Ad Glossary
Advertisers
How It Works
Creative Spec Sheet
Apply Today
Contact Us
Programs
Performance Based Video Ad Campaigns
Video Advertising for Brand Advertisers
Local Video Advertising
Publishers
How It Works
Publisher FAQs
Apply Today
Contact Us
SpotXchange - Video Advertising Marketplace Denver - (HQ) - New York - London - Sydney - Chicago - Atlanta - Los Angeles - San Francisco
© 2012 SpotXchange, Inc. | 303.345.6650